Pleasanton

PleasantonCA.city — Tri-Valley neighborhood news with hometown heart.

Local business? Support local news on PleasantonCA.city

Back to California

California's new limits on AI 'bossware' are about to kick in, and employers may not know their software is covered

One of five workplace AI bills Newsom signed in September bars employers from using surveillance tools to read workers' emotions; an East Bay labor coalition wants cities and counties to go further.

Tobias Teague· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

October 28, 20262 min read

AI Workplace Regulation - illustration, Jake Team LLC

New California rules on artificial intelligence used to watch and manage workers are about to take effect, putting the state further than any other in regulating so-called bossware, and an employment lawyer warns that many businesses may not realize the software they already run falls under them, KQED reported Wednesday.

At the end of September, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed five bills backed by organized labor that regulate AI in the workplace. Two stand out:

  • AB 1883 limits employers' use of AI-driven workplace surveillance tools to read workers' emotions or collect their neural data.
  • AB 1979 bars health facilities from letting AI by itself handle work reserved for licensed professionals, and requires them to protect clinicians' independent judgment when AI informs patient care.

A nurse's sentiment score

KQED's report centers on a Kaiser Permanente telephone triage nurse in the Central Valley who said she found a "sentiment score" attached to her recorded calls after returning from maternity leave, following a 2024 pilot that nurses had been told was paused. She said she could not tell what scale the numbers used.

A Kaiser spokesperson told KQED the company does not "currently" use AI to recognize, predict or infer nurses' emotional states and is reviewing what AB 1883 means for its operations. Kaiser did not answer KQED's questions about whether its call platform produces sentiment scores.

Anthony Zaller, a lawyer who represents employers, told KQED that scoring whether a worker said the right words is acceptable but scoring what the worker was feeling is now off limits. He said companies often do not realize how deeply AI is built into the products they buy, and that they cannot avoid responsibility under existing law because a decision ran through software.

Business pushback and a local push

The California Chamber of Commerce opposed AB 1883, telling lawmakers the term "emotional state" would invite lawsuits and that the ban could catch AI security systems that flag agitation or aggression, tools some employers adopted to meet a 2023 state requirement for workplace violence prevention plans.

On the other side, a labor coalition that includes the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy, which focuses on Alameda and Contra Costa counties, says the state laws are only a start.

Stasia Hansen, the group's deputy director of research and strategy, said the bills lost some strength in committee and that the coalition plans to seek stronger protections from cities and counties, starting with public employers. KQED found no Bay Area city or county that has agreed to take up such a measure so far.

Similar bills aimed at emotion-detecting AI at work died this year in Minnesota, New York and Washington, according to KQED. The European Union has banned emotion recognition in the workplace since 2025.

Sources

ww2.kqed.org

Share

Tobias Teague· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Tobias Teague reports on local business, new openings, and economic development in Pleasanton.

Related Stories

More in Sport