Pleasanton

PleasantonCA.city — Tri-Valley neighborhood news with hometown heart.

Local business? Support local news on PleasantonCA.city

Back to California

Record outside spending tops $6 million in the insurance commissioner race, and some insurer money has reached a PAC backing Allen

Independent committees have spent about $3.2 million to help Sen. Ben Allen and more than $1.5 million against Jane Kim. Both Democrats swore off insurance industry checks; Allen says he did not ask for the new donations.

Sasha Ortiz· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

October 27, 20262 min read

California election ballot - illustration, Jake Team LLC

Neither candidate for California insurance commissioner is taking campaign checks from the insurance industry. That has not kept industry money out of the contest entirely, according to a CalMatters review of who is paying for the outside groups in the race.

Political action committees that work independently of the campaigns have spent more than $6 million on the race so far, counting the June primary, CalMatters reported. That is the most ever for the office, which regulates property and casualty insurers in California.

Who the money is helping

About $3.2 million of that has gone toward supporting state Sen. Ben Allen, and more than $1.5 million has been spent opposing former San Francisco Supervisor Jane Kim. Both are Democrats. Some of the groups behind that spending count insurance companies among their funders, campaign finance records show.

In the past week, three bail bond insurers each gave $10,000 to a committee backing Allen, an entity that appears tied to the bail bond business gave $9,500, and a PAC tied to health insurers gave $48,000. Investor-owned utilities, including Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric, have also given to groups supporting him.

Larger donors to the pro-Allen and anti-Kim committees include Meta, Google co-founder Sergey Brin, a PAC of the California Business Roundtable, and Chris Larsen, a crypto billionaire whose roughly $3.5 million across three committees makes him the largest individual outside contributor.

Spending on Kim's behalf tops $958,000, with the California Working Families Party supplying most of it, which Kim led until she entered the race. That party's PAC is funded mostly by individuals and labor groups.

Because the committees act independently, candidates cannot send their donations back the way they can return a direct contribution.

What the candidates say

"I didn't ask for this and don't welcome it," Allen told CalMatters. He said he still will not accept direct contributions from insurers, utilities or fossil fuel companies, and at a debate this month he pointed to bills he has carried against insurers, including one that strengthens the commissioner's power to make companies fix problems found in investigations.

Kim argued the donations show what the industry wants. "These contributions are an investment in him and themselves, not for consumers," she said. She has said she has not accepted money from insurance carriers, their PACs or corporate PACs.

Allen's campaign questioned the independence of the spending for Kim. Spokesperson Joe Arellano called the Working Families Party "her own political operation." Kim's campaign said the party keeps a strict firewall between its independent spending and its coordinated work.

Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog, said his group is publicly neutral on the race. He described the bail bond donations as a small amount from a "rogue element" and said large insurers have mostly stayed out.

The winner will be chosen Nov. 3.

Sources

pleasantonweekly.com

Share

Sasha Ortiz· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Sasha Ortiz covers Pleasanton city hall, the council, and county government.

Related Stories

More in Sport