Pleasanton

PleasantonCA.city — Tri-Valley neighborhood news with hometown heart.

Back to Pleasanton

Residents' petition asks for data limits on sidewalk-survey robots; company says it does not track people

A resident's petition seeks guardrails on what the Daxbots surveying sidewalks for the city's ADA plan can collect; Daxbot says its robots gather only slope, uplift and path-width data.

Reese Hardy

October 7, 20262 min read

Sidewalk survey robot on street - illustration, Jake Team LLC

Some Pleasanton residents want the city to put written limits on what data can be collected by the small robots now rolling through neighborhoods to survey sidewalks, the Pleasanton Weekly reported Wednesday.

The Daxbots began work last month on the city's Public Right-of-Way Survey, which gathers information on sidewalk accessibility and condition for Pleasanton's ADA Transition Plan. The City Council approved the roughly $435,000 contract with Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments on March 17 as part of its consent calendar, according to the council agenda report cited by the paper.

The petition

Brent Werder, a lifelong resident and mechanical-design engineer who works in robot automation, started a Change.org petition after he said a robot sat in front of his house for about seven hours. The petition had 83 signatures as of Wednesday, four days after it launched, the Weekly reported.

Werder told the paper he saw robots on a street corner "turning their heads to look at passersby and cars" and said that did not seem necessary for a sidewalk survey.

He said the city's contract with Bureau Veritas has no explicit restrictions on using or keeping data the robots collect, does not name the Daxbot as the main data tool and does not limit what the machines can record. He also faulted the city for not doing public outreach before approving the program.

He has proposed three guardrails if the robots stay: clear rules on data handling, deletion of unneeded raw sensor data by a third party, and a public report on what is collected, where it is stored, for how long and who can see it.

The company's response

In a statement provided through the city, Daxbot communications director Miriam Sullivan said the company is "privacy first" and collects data in public spaces only as needed for specific tasks, such as slopes, uplifts and path widths, which it does not share publicly.

"We do not identify or track individuals or sell or distribute imagery of identifiable people, and our assessment robots don't record or store video except in the rare case of safety incidents," Sullivan said. Each robot carries a QR code explaining its task and equipment, she said, and she pointed to the company's published principles for robots in public spaces.

The Weekly's report did not say whether the city plans any changes to the contract or the survey.

Sources

pleasantonweekly.com

pleasantonweekly.com

daxbot.com

Share

Reese Hardy

Reese Hardy writes about community life, schools, public safety, and local events in Pleasanton.

Related Stories

More in California