Pleasanton

PleasantonCA.city — Tri-Valley neighborhood news with hometown heart.

Local business? Support local news on PleasantonCA.city

Back to California

State water board grants Sites Reservoir its river permit, a project Pleasanton's wholesale supplier Zone 7 has backed since 2016

The board voted unanimously Wednesday to let the Sacramento Valley reservoir divert up to 986,000 acre-feet a year. Zone 7, which supplies Pleasanton, sits on its reservoir committee; tribes and environmental groups oppose it.

Reese Hardy· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

November 5, 20262 min read

Sacramento River Permit - illustration, Jake Team LLC

A Sacramento Valley reservoir that Zone 7 Water Agency, which supplies Pleasanton, has been helping plan for nearly a decade cleared a major state hurdle Wednesday.

The State Water Resources Control Board voted unanimously to grant a water right permit to the Sites Reservoir project, an off-stream lake planned about 65 miles northwest of Sacramento near the town of Maxwell, according to the board and Courthouse News Service.

The permit lets the project divert up to 986,000 acre-feet a year from the Sacramento River, which the board says is enough water for about 8.4 million people annually.

Where Zone 7 fits

Zone 7 is the wholesale supplier for Pleasanton, Dublin, Livermore and part of San Ramon, serving about 265,000 residents through four retail agencies, according to the agency's profile on the Sites Project Authority website.

That profile says about 70% of Zone 7's supply is imported water and that the agency joined the Sites Reservoir Committee in 2016, citing the need for new supplies to meet future demand and keep deliveries reliable.

Zone 7 is one of more than 20 water agencies represented on the reservoir committee, alongside Central Valley farm water districts and Southern California suppliers.

What the permit allows

The board said the reservoir would be the state's biggest new surface storage project in over half a century. Under the permit, the project may divert only between November and mid-June, and only when flows are surplus to senior water rights, Delta water quality and fish needs.

It must also follow the Bay-Delta Plan update the board adopted last week, use fish screens, and meet water quality limits on releases.

Wednesday's approval covers only the Sacramento River. Whether Sites may also capture water from Funks and Stone Corral creeks will be taken up at a separate hearing starting in January, the board said.

Supporters and opponents

Board Chair E. Joaquin Esquivel said in the board's announcement that the updated Bay-Delta framework lets projects like Sites run in a way that protects river systems while adding supply, and that "expanding opportunities to increase supplies through storage makes sense." Union members and water agency representatives spoke in favor at the meeting, Courthouse News reported.

Opponents asked the board to reject or change the permit. San Francisco Baykeeper argued that minimum flow requirements should be written into the permit and made enforceable, and Friends of the River's policy director said the project would harm fish and destroy sacred tribal lands, estimating its cost at $6.8 billion to $9 billion, according to Courthouse News.

Speakers from the Chhé'ee Fókaa Band of Northeastern Pomo said tribal concerns had been ignored. The board added clarifying language on required flows and tribal consultation before voting.

Courthouse News reported that the reservoir is expected to begin operating in 2035.

Sources

mavensnotebook.com

courthousenews.com

sitesproject.org

sitesproject.org

Share

Reese Hardy· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Reese Hardy writes about community life, schools, public safety, and local events in Pleasanton.

Related Stories

More in Sport